Deck Database

BANDIT KEITH SUCCESSFULLY NERFED! (deck id: 94689)
Tribe: Devil
60 Maindeck cards and 0 Sideboard
Legacy Tribal Wars: Underdog · Devil Aggro-Combo
Played by  Bandit Keith in Tribal Apocalypse 10.39 (2-1)
MAINDECK (60 Cards)
26 Creatures
4 Chained Brute

4 Hellrider

4 Mayhem Devil

4 Rakdos Cackler

4 Vexing Devil

3 Greater Gargadon

3 Sin Prodder

12 Spells
4 Claim the Firstborn

4 Lightning Bolt

4 Village Rites

22 Lands
7 Mountain

4 Bloodstained Mire

4 Wooded Foothills

2 Badlands

2 Dragonskull Summit

2 Sunbaked Canyon

1 Swamp

SIDEBOARD (0 Cards)
MATCHUPS
R1:  Win 2 - 0vs.   Deonmag  (Tribal Wars) Specter 
R2:  Win 2 - 0vs.   Nydethess  Mill 
R3:  Loss 0 - 2vs.   AJ_Impy  Assemblers, Forsake! 
 
MANA SYMBOLS
  34
  12
Total:  46
CASTING COSTS
  x 20
  x 4
  x 7
  x 4
  x 3
Avg CMC: 2.50
COMMENTS
Isn't that what the latest round of bannings were for? Who plays a heavy ponderance of those cards regularly? (And I was told that a Cloudpost ban - one card - would be a player-specific ban, jeez...) But I guess I feel very flattered.

Still upsetting that something like Rattlechains hits a ban (yes, even in Legacy), but something like Witch's Vengeance - also complained about by the players in Colombia and yet ignored (whereas TKS wasn't, since a certain player favors playing Eldrazi) - avoids a ban. Such is democracy I suppose.

As such, it is not needed to metagame against me so hard, as I have noticed over the past couple of weeks with certain cards and strategy choices. Seems a bit like overkill, gentlemen?

Though it was implied that I am the only player who tries to win, so maybe I deserve all the targeting. Only I bring tier 1 tribes, competitive decks, and expensive cards, obviously. Me, and my shocklands in Legacy, with Commandeer instead of FoW...