Event Report
| Standard Heirloom 1.11 27 July 2012 Standard Heirloom · 16 Players 16 Decks · 100% Reported 3 rounds Swiss Top 8 playoff Hosted by cathomas Event Report Season Leaderboard | Return_To_Xaos The Big White Life |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Metagame Breakdown | |||||||
|
2 Players | ||||||
VIP |
3-2 | goblins | Aggro | ||||
Cleomar |
2-2 | Gobbos Win | Aggro | ||||
|
2 Players | ||||||
zippy75 |
5-1 | Boring Delver | Unclassified | ||||
| hogger |
0-3 | Blue Humans | Unclassified | ||||
|
2 Players | ||||||
chups |
3-2 | Burning Heirloom | Control | ||||
cathomas |
2-2 | Burning Vengeance | Combo-Control | ||||
|
2 Players | ||||||
| ssWakizashI |
1-2 | Last Crusade | Midrange | ||||
| wolverine82 |
1-2 | GW Humans | Aggro | ||||
|
1 Players | ||||||
| kokonade1000 |
0-2 | Ding Dong Banu | Unclassified | ||||
|
1 Players | ||||||
| jackfrost86 |
1-1 | friday night moon | Aggro | ||||
|
1 Players | ||||||
pyro0734 |
2-2 | br control | Control | ||||
|
1 Players | ||||||
| Norwood | 0-1 | UB Control | Control | ||||
|
1 Players | ||||||
Return_To_Xaos |
6-0 | The Big White Life | Control | ||||
|
1 Players | ||||||
| charlesovery |
0-2 | Humans | Aggro | ||||
|
1 Players | ||||||
SilentJ |
2-2 | White Tokens | Aggro | ||||
|
1 Players | ||||||
| wlcrh |
1-2 | cacharro | Unclassified | ||||
Current Standings | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard Heirloom 1.11 | |||||||
| Rank | Player | Match Points | OMW % | PGW % | OGW % | Matches Played | Byes |
| 1 | Return_To_Xaos | 18 | 0.333 | 0.857 | 0.418 | 6 | 0 |
| 2 | zippy75 | 15 | 0.444 | 0.999 | 0.413 | 6 | 0 |
| 3 | chups | 9 | 0.667 | 0.625 | 0.577 | 5 | 0 |
| 4 | VIP | 9 | 0.556 | 0.667 | 0.524 | 5 | 0 |
| 5 | cathomas | 9 | 0.333 | 0.625 | 0.339 | 5 | 0 |
| 6 | Cleomar | 6 | 0.556 | 0.500 | 0.560 | 4 | 0 |
| 7 | pyro0734 | 6 | 0.500 | 0.571 | 0.581 | 5 | 0 |
| 8 | SilentJ | 6 | 0.222 | 0.571 | 0.337 | 4 | 0 |
| 9 | ssWakizashI | 3 | 0.833 | 0.000 | 0.833 | 2 | 1 |
| 10 | wlcrh | 3 | 0.556 | 0.429 | 0.519 | 3 | 0 |
| 11 | wolverine82 | 3 | 0.444 | 0.375 | 0.483 | 3 | 0 |
| 12 | jackfrost86 | 3 | 0.333 | 0.600 | 0.286 | 2 | 0 |
| 13 | charlesovery | 0 | 0.667 | 0.200 | 0.616 | 2 | 0 |
| 14 | hogger | 0 | 0.667 | 0.143 | 0.589 | 3 | 0 |
| 15 | kokonade1000 | 0 | 0.500 | 0.200 | 0.500 | 2 | 0 |
| 16 | Norwood | 0 | 0.500 | 0.000 | 0.600 | 1 | 0 |
Tiebreakers Explained | |||||||
| Players with the same number of match points are ranked based on three tiebreakers scores according to DCI rules. In order, they are: | |||||||
| OMW % is the average percentage of matches your opponents have won. | |||||||
| PGW % is the percentage of games you have won. | |||||||
| OGW % is the average percentage of games your opponents have won. | |||||||
| BYEs are not included when calculating standings. For example, a player with one BYE, one win, and one loss has a match win percentage of .50 rather than .66 | |||||||
| When calculating standings, any opponent with less than a .33 win percentage is calculated as .33 | |||||||

1st
2nd
T4

T8


